Pull up to the bumper. Not by Grace Jones
Edit By:Care Cars
Q:I was driving home this evening and the driver of the car behind me, pulled up so close behind me it was rude!
Then he did it again, and again. In fact the whole duration he was behind me he kept doing it. Now this wasn't an aggressive gesture, there hadn't been any road rage, just this doddery old coffin dodger was... well, rubbish really!
Anyhoo, got me wondering about the legal aspects, if I had rolled back slightly into his car? Whose fault? mine? well yes, but no... He was unreasonably close, but is there a legal definition for 'too close'? Being an honest chap I would probably admit to rolling back, but if I was clever about it, I should say nuffin and it would be more plausible if the driver behind had driven into the vehicle in front...
Any thoughts?
Then he did it again, and again. In fact the whole duration he was behind me he kept doing it. Now this wasn't an aggressive gesture, there hadn't been any road rage, just this doddery old coffin dodger was... well, rubbish really!
Anyhoo, got me wondering about the legal aspects, if I had rolled back slightly into his car? Whose fault? mine? well yes, but no... He was unreasonably close, but is there a legal definition for 'too close'? Being an honest chap I would probably admit to rolling back, but if I was clever about it, I should say nuffin and it would be more plausible if the driver behind had driven into the vehicle in front...
Any thoughts?
Random Tip:How To Avoid Collisions When Driving
A:I had a disco go into the back of me with a fantastic crunch!
He denied hitting me, his wife and 13 yo daughter both told me to do something rude (G F Y!) and drove off without giving details. I got his index and rang GMP. They told me I could only act against him if there was damage to the car. I had it serviced the next day and the main dealer went over it with a magnifying glass and couldn't find anything.
But isn't that wrong? The guy who drove off had no idea whether any damage had been caused or not (therefore did not know if he was obliged to swap details), so why does he get away with driving off?
He denied hitting me, his wife and 13 yo daughter both told me to do something rude (G F Y!) and drove off without giving details. I got his index and rang GMP. They told me I could only act against him if there was damage to the car. I had it serviced the next day and the main dealer went over it with a magnifying glass and couldn't find anything.
But isn't that wrong? The guy who drove off had no idea whether any damage had been caused or not (therefore did not know if he was obliged to swap details), so why does he get away with driving off?
Random Tip:Upgrade Your Car By Yourself
A:
Because, no harm done, now go away you silly man and let us catch people driving 34 mph in a 30 zone... miles from anything at 5 in the morning in good visibility and good driving conditions...
If he had done it to a plain clothes policeman in an unmarked police car, would he get away with it?
Because, no harm done, now go away you silly man and let us catch people driving 34 mph in a 30 zone... miles from anything at 5 in the morning in good visibility and good driving conditions...
If he had done it to a plain clothes policeman in an unmarked police car, would he get away with it?
